Mar 04 2010

the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations

Published by admin at 16:37 under The personal part

“How the faithful city has become a harlot! It was full of justice; Righteousness lodged in it, But now murderers. Your silver has become dross, Your wine mixed with water. Your princes are rebellious, And companions of thieves; Everyone loves bribes, And follows after rewards. They do not defend the fatherless, Nor does the cause of the widow come before them.” (Isaiah 1:21-23)

“He looked for justice, but behold, oppression; For righteousness, but behold, a cry for help.” (Isaiah 5:7).

In this part, “the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations”, I will tell you about three strange “trials”, that were carried out at the Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law by the judge Siruta, by the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, and about “appeal”, which took place in the Regional Tel Aviv Court of Law. The letters concerning the “trial”, that were sent to the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, to the Minister of Justice, to the State Controller, and others, are attached to this part. None of the addressees answered.

Criminal case No. 1858/89

On the sixth of June 1998, in an exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations, I was sentenced to 10 months of jail (criminal case No. 7854/93). The story began with the criminal case No. 1858/89, with the judge Siruta, which was about the letters I had sent to the Fuehrer Shamir (Prime Minister Shamir), to the fearful Defense Minister Rabin (who ordered to break hands and legs; the term “fearful” is taken from fearful Ivan, whose court was taking place then), to the Knesset member Elyakim Haetsni from Kiryat-Arba, and others. Pictures of Magen David in the form of Swastika were attached to those letters.

The Law Court appointed a lawyer, Maxim Atias, as my attorney for the criminal case No. 1858/89. He demanded a deferment in order to “come to more fundamental terms with [his] defendant”. The request was honored and the court session was deferred. The “lawyer” asked me for my phone number in order to invite me to his office, but he never did that. I took the initiative to call him, and he said to me that he would meet me a few minutes before the beginning of the session in a corridor of the court building. As we met, he asked me if I am personally familiar with Yitshak Shamir, who was the Prime Minister at that time, and if I was in Etsel or Lehi. He asked me then, why did not I send similar letters to Shulamit Aloni and Yosi Sarid as well, since they were even worse.

I told to my “attorney” about two trials that I had stood earlier for the same crime – Letters that I sent to famous politicians. Two lawyers who were appointed to me then (by the law court) performed their duties properly and the defendant was acquitted. The “attorney” Maxim Atias sealed his ears and asserted that there was no connection between the two previous criminal cases and this trial, and pushed me to confess to the crime. Such kind of treating the criminal case saved a lot of job for him, and the court came out paid.

The judge Siruta sentenced me to three months in jail or 1000 shekels fine. At all trials it’s customary to sentence someone to two months or 1000 shekels fine. I got three months. The “lawyer” asked to split the fine into two payments. By this he fulfilled all his duties.

I refused to pay the fine in order not to support “intifada” suppression, and not to help the enemy, so I was sent to jail for three months service. (Instead of the usual two months.)

I was not able to come to terms with this injustice, so I posted advertisements, that contained the words “Lawyer Maxim Atias, – You are a liar”, and the summary of development of the events. The advertisements were posted near the court, Tel-Aviv Agency of Lawyers, and surroundings. Likewise I sent letters regarding the subject to the Minister of Justice, to the State Comptroller, and others.

Criminal case No. 7854/93

The “attorney” made a complaint in police about threatening and bothering. The trial for the criminal case number 7854/93 had been lasting for a year and a half. “Trials” for all the criminal cases, 1858/89, 7853/93, 3995/98, Tel-Aviv Peace Court, and the “appeal”, criminal case number 4388/98, Tel-Aviv District, were driven similar to military trials, which were carried on against Palestinians on the occupied territories. The only difference was that at the military “trials” on the occupied territories they talk Arabic to the defendants, while they talked Hebrew to me. Judges at the military trials, which are carried on the occupied territories, are settlers, members of Gush Emunim, always believe to Jews, as they are settlers, soldiers and security men. (Their testimonies are always given behind the closed doors for some security reasons). And also judges believe to Kvizalings (kapo), Palestinian cooperators, part of whom were forced by different non-human ways, (threats, compulsion) to cooperate with the occupant and to make a testimony. Till now it never happened that the judges believed to a Palestinian or to his or her attorney.

During the first “trial”, in the criminal case No. 7854/93, which was carried out on 10.12.96 before the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, and which took place only after numerous delays for different reasons (it started on 7.6.94, and came to its end on 10.12.96, after the plaintiff made a favor to everybody by his coming to the trial), a lot of strange accidents took place.

The plaintiff, lawyer Maxim Atias, invited two security men , who were supposed to protect the helpless poor complainant, a victim of violence and racism, from the bad attack by the defendant, Shabtai Levi, who is a very dangerous and cruel criminal.

The poor plaintiff handled a number of documents to the “judge”. The judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, asked me every time when he received a document from the plaintiff, if I had any objection to the fact of handling the documents. A copy of a document has not been given to me, and they have not allowed me to study the content of the documents.

The poor plaintiff announced himself as being “a victim of violence and racism” due to the fact that there were Swastikas in the posters, which the defendant posted. The poor plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism, has a lot of witnesses to that. (There were no Swastikas in the posters I posted against the plaintiff!).

The plaintiff proclaimed Rabin as “Rabin, be his memory blessed”. (I do not remember, why exactly, maybe in connection to the letters, which I sent to Rabin, in the criminal case No. 1858/89, in which the plaintiff “defended” me. In those letters I did paint Magen David in the form of Swastika. The plaintiff made use of the material from the criminal case No. 1858/89, when he “defended” me, against me.

When the judge Hanan Efrati invited me to deliver my testimony and to answer to the accusations, I was not able to say a word. At the office of the court of law they refused to give me the file to study, since I did not have an identification card, and the judge, a layman knew that. I did not get any copies of any documents, that were delivered short time before that. The prosecutor inferred, that the lies of the plaintiff are true from the fact that I was not able to speak. (See the letter of 10.4.95, “Request for being sued not in my presence”, and the letter of 21.8.95, concerning return of the bill of charge and the protocols).

The judge, a layman, Hanan Efrati, clearly leaned to the side of his friend, a plaintiff and heaped praises and compliments on him: “… that these people who present defendants at criminal trials, who, in my eyes, are frontier warriors at the first line of defense for civil and private rights…” At the second “trial” the judge recalled these ugly compliments as well.

The judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, sentenced me to conditional jail service, to money obligation and to compensations payment to the miserable plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism. The payment should be as great as NIS 1000, and the money obligation should be of NIS 5000, which will prevent the defendant from bothering the miserable plaintiff.

The invitation of two security men by the plaintiff was a low and filthy action, – it was done intentionally, in order to create an atmosphere of terror and cruelty in the hall of the court of law. This kind of misery show and the self announcing of the plaintiff as being “a victim of violence and racism”, his lies about Swastikas, and the security men who were invited by him, made a serious impression on the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman. (Two security men were very close to me in order not to give me possibility to attack the miserable and helpless plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism).

Criminal case No. 3995/98

The second “trial”, criminal case number 3995/98, a continuation of the first “trial”, criminal case number 7854/93, drove by the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, took place on 3.5.98 and 6.9.98. At the first session of the exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations, the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, asked me to sign in his presence the two documents, which I sent on 9.4.98, at the secretariat of the court of law, and forgot to sign them: “notification of guilt” and “defense letter”, and announced, that the defendant signed them in his presence, and he is aware what he signed. The judge proposed to me to appoint a lawyer and to send me to an expertise officer. I refused. The judge, a layman, threatened me, that he would impose a condition upon me and send me to jail. All of a sudden he announced a break, and got out off the courtroom. The lawyer Shlomo Grinboym, who was present in the courtroom, proposed to me to agree to the Judge’s conditions and his service. I notified the judge, a layman that I accept his two conditions, to go to an expertise officer, and to appoint a lawyer to me, but only not to impose conditions upon me and not to send me to jail. The “trial” was deferred till 6.9.98.

The lawyer Shlomo Greenboym, “my attorney”, informed me that I should call him a few days before the trial. As I called he told me that he would meet me just before the beginning of the session, in a corridor. As we met he told me that he hoped that the judge would base on the expertise officer memorandum and would not send me to jail.

The judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, invited me to the dock, and started directly by announcing the sentence. The judge, a layman, imposed the condition on me and sent me to a spadework service for half a year. The judge, a layman, stated that I do continue to threaten his miserable hopeless friend, the lawyer Maxim Atias, a victim of cruelty and racism, and that I visited his office in order to threaten him. (The miserable plaintiff, victim of cruelty and racism, was not presented in the courtroom). The judge, a layman, related to my letter of 9.4.98, (“defense letter” and “notification of guilt”), and of 3.8.98, (attached to this letter) and to my other letters, by great severity, believed to every single word I wrote, criticized their content, but he accepted the harlot’s pay to the court of law of 9000 shekels, which I paid, since money doesn’t smell at all, and the State of Israel, a prostitute, needs a lot of money. (Harlot court pay.) Lie, which returns many times, and which is for the good of a miserable plaintiff, a victim of the cruelty and racism, and for the good of the court, the State of Israel, a prostitute, and Jews, turned to be a truth.

The “attorney” who was appointed to me by the judge, a layman, the lawyer Shlomo Greenboym, did not open his mouth, and did not say a word during the whole “trial”. Very likely that the judge-layman Hanan Efrati’s sudden leaving the courtroom for a break was intentional – in order to let the lawyer persuade me to accept his conditions. The judge, a layman, Hanan Efrati knew well that he could do everything he would like with such a reliable “attorney” as the lawyer Shlomo Greenboym. The judge, a layman, lied to me when he threatened me that he would impose the condition on me if I did not accept his generous proposals. The judge, a layman pushed me, and forced me by threats that he would send me to jail, to accept Shlomo Greenboym as my attorney, and in order to cover his mean acts.

I notified to the judge, a layman that I’m not interested in the spadework service. (Before the accident I worked as a tractor operator during the Sinai attrition war. The contractor did not pay my salary. The complaints about delaying wages, which I filed, were not complied with for “lack of evidence”. (See the section “The work liberates”). The work was in very dangerous conditions. I had other criminal cases of delaying wages. It was difficult to me to agree to work for free after everything that happened to me).

The judge, a layman was happy about an unexpected opportunity that was given to him, and used the mistake I made for my great stupidity, and sent me to jail for 6 months. After two months he changed the sentence and increased it to ten months, and that was not in my presence. The “attorney” kept silent during the whole “trial” and did not asked the judge for deference for me to get some clothes. I did not change clothes for ten days.

The judge, a layman, Hanan Efrati cited sections from my letter of 3.8.98, and other letters (“that I’m similar to an Arab”, “Jewish living-wage”, “abscess of Israel”, called Shamir “Fihrer”, and more). He was angry on the content of the letters, criticized them, but he willingly agreed to accept the harlot’s pay to the court of law of 9000 shekels for the good and glory of the State of Israel, a prostitute. By that way he kindly “took into account” my age and my position, and showed his “mercy on me”. A copy of the verdict was not given to me.

Not every day happens to the judge, a layman, Hanan Efrati such a stupid Jewish defendant like me, who volunteers to confess to charges, and pays the harlot’s pay to the court of law with such a generosity. I will never have a chance to get back the harlot’s pay to the court of law (1000 shekels of compensations, which the judge, a layman, stated for me to pay to the miserable plaintiff, a victim of cruelty and racism, and 8000 shekels, which I paid in addition) because the State of Israel, a prostitute, alienated this sum according to law, which serves the religious community, settlements, production of more nuclear explosives to destroy all of its districts when the day comes, in order to create Jewish living space (Liebensraum).

The judge, a layman, Hanan Efrati created a nice legal context to alienate and to annex the harlot’s pay to the court of law of 9000 shekels in honor and glory to the State of Israel, a prostitute.

Lie, which returns many times, and which is to the good of the miserable plaintiff, a victim of the cruelty and racism, and to the good of the court of law, to the good of the State of Israel and Jews, was turned to be the truth.

Shabbtay Levi

The copies of the documents, which were sent to the Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law concerning the criminal cases No. 7854/93, 3995/98 are attached to this letter together with the letters which were sent to the Minister of Justice, to the State Controller, and others.

To the Peace Court, criminal case No. 7854/93, Tel-Aviv 10.4.95

Request for being sued not in my presence.

I request to be sued not in my presence for the following reasons:

On the 2.2.95 I filed a letter at the secretariat. In the letter I noted that I do not have an identification card, and that I wasn’t permitted to have a look into the medical expertise and into my criminal case file. So, as I expected, the court of law ignored the letter and did not make an effort to give an answer to me, in spite of the fact that I made a clear note that I do not have an identification card, that the secretary refused to give me the information and I do not have a possibility to get an answer from the court of law.

I do not have a chance to stand against the lawyer Maxim Atias. I do not have witnesses, I do not have proofs, and I do not have any possibility to prove my words. He has proper right witnesses, who can testify in his favor, like his mother, his secretary, and his wife who will testify under oath about the threats which I made to them, and so the righteous and honest people who will testify under oath that they saw me posting advertisements (with swastika!). The lawyer Maxim Atias has professional knowledge and he has all the options to prove his arguments owing to being familiar with “right” people. The court of law will reject all my arguments and will, obviously, accept the arguments of Maxim Atias, since they are hold by proper witnesses, truth tellers, who will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Also in the criminal case number 1858/89 the court of law, which appointed Maxim Atias as my attorney, ignored the fact that he did not perform his job properly, did not prepare a defense letter and did not bothered himself to invite me to his office, though he demanded a deferment in order to “come to more fundamental terms with [his] defendant”, as he detailed in the deferment request. Now it’s a time to make a note here that all the letters that I wrote to the court of law, to the Minister of Justice, to the State Comptroller, to the Agency of Lawyers and more, were not answered. The court of law covers his attorney and supports him.

I do not have any trust in the court of law, and in the whole system of Israel institutions. I found out that to look for justice in the State of Israel is the same thing as to look for justice in the Nazi Germany, and the laws of the State of Israel are similar to the Nuremberg laws. So happened, that the road accident, criminal case number 2241/70 of 24.4.70, was closed for the “lack of evidence”, and the driver who trampled me, made me invalid and destroyed my life, wasn’t judged and wasn’t sentenced. Also for the “lack of evidence” I lost the criminal case 2/104/69 at the court of law for labor conflicts in Tel-Aviv, and many other criminal cases as well.

As my trustful attorney came to more fundamental terms with his defendant in his fancy office, which is in the corridor of the court of law, I notified him about my intention not to confess and told him that I would like to invite the plaintiff in this criminal case, the lawyer Elyakim Haetsni to testify, and also told him about the two previous trials, in which I was acquitted. The lawyer Maxim Atias, being right in his political orientation and being partner to Elyakim Haetsni in this aspect (I identify myself with the left and anti-Zionism), did not want to make his professional and political partner Elyakim Haetsni busy, because he is very busy and help to Kwizalings (kapo) (cooperators), righteous ones of the world nations, and so tried to persuade me by falsehood to confess, the thing which will save a lot of work for him, and the court of law, which appointed him got its pay.

The political, social and legal statuses of the lawyer Maxim Atias are higher than mine. The plaintiff contributed a lot to the security of the State, served in the elite army forces, participated in many wars of the State of Israel, and killed a lot of Arabs. The plaintiff, being of pure Jewish race, the special one and chosen from all the other nations, the best among the peoples and selected among the races, is equal to 1000 Arabs and people from the left. The defendant, Shabbtay Levi, doesn’t belong to the Jewish people of masters, his skull is not of the right shape, the Lord did not choose him among the nations, worthless person and sub-human. Henceforth, his status is defective, and he is not defined as a person whom one may take into account and respect. (And thus, for this reason, the criminal case 2241/07 was closed for the “lack of evidences”, he lost his claims at the work court of law, and even Gestapo (the Israeli police) ignores the complaints, which stupid Jew filed against the two witnesses, who stole from him; and his complaints against the lawyer Maxim Atias, and his actions will not be treated at all).

I have many more complaints against Maxim Atias and the court of law, but it’s worthless to detail them here, since I do not have any possibility to prove it, I do not have witnesses, and the court of law will reject all my claims. I have no chance to succeed in standing against a righteous truth teller, who will swear on his God. And it is absolutely clear to me that I’ll lose the trial, and that I’ll go to jail or pay a heavy fine. I intend to appear in a set time in order to get an answer from the court of law, to hear the verdict, and to go to jail if the court of law decides that.

Shabbtay Levi

To the Tel-Aviv Peace Court, criminal case 7854/93

Filed at secretariat on 21.8.95

By this I return the verdict of guilty and the protocols of the court of law. The return is made as a protest, that till now I am not given a possibility to look into the medical expertise report and into the criminal case records.

Another reason is the repeated and different trial deferments and that the court refrained from inviting the plaintiff to testify.

Shabbtay Levi

To Tel-Aviv Peace Court 7.5.96

Criminal case 7854/93

On 26.2.96 I was sent to an observation at the second time in this criminal case. The reason for that is a letter by lawyer Menahem Goshan from Nahariya, in which it was written that I was mentally ill, and that several times I was hospitalized in mental clinic in the past, and so she recommended to hospitalize me one more time. I was asked by the court of law about the mental disorder and about different and repeated hospitalizations, and I did not get answer to that. Another reason for sending to the examination is letters that I sent to the court of law.

Recall, I was sent for an observation on 7.6.94 for the first time by judge Lidski. The examination was performed on 28.6.94. In the report of the Abarbanel hospital it was asserted about me that “the defendant suffers from the great number of mental problems”, which the judge Lidski revealed to me, making me a favor.

I would like to mention here that at the second examination, which took place on 7.4.96, they did not talk about my previous hospitalizations at all, and not about the mental disorder, and there was no any relation to the document by the lawyer Menahem Goshan, and to the letters I sent to the court of law, nothing about the reason for sending me to the examination for one more time.

For the reason that there is a serious contradiction here between the results of the first examination, documents by the lawyer Goshan and the results of the second examination, I ask to clarify that.

On 14.4.96 they spoke of giving me a possibility to have a look into the criminal case documents and into the results of the medical expertise. Since I do not have an identification card, and I will not have one in future, I will not have a possibility to read the criminal case materials and the results of the medical expertise, as it was not given to me in the past. Even if I get the documents of the trial and the medical expertise, and if I study them well, I certainly will have questions, and I will have nobody to answer them and give me explanations, thus I will not succeed in standing against the lawyer Atias.

The plaintiff will experience no problems in obtaining the materials of the trial and the medical expertise, and accompannied documents, and he will have a possibility to photocopy them. There is a possibility that the plaintiff will use the medical documents for the bad. See the enclosed document of 14.5.95

Shabbtay Levi

To:

The Minister of Justice (check of the court of law enclosed)

The State Controller (the check of the court of law enclosed)

The Prime Minister office

The Committee for the Law and Constitution (the check of the court of law enclosed)

The Assembly of Lawyers

Local and foreign media

18.3.97

Criminal case number 7854/93

In an exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations, at the trial on the criminal case number 7854/93, which was held on 10.12.96, the Human Rights Day, the “judge” stated, that the defendant, Shabbtay Levi would compensate the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias by 1000 shekels, and sign an obligation of 5000 shekels to refrain from harassing the plaintiff.

By this I notify you that the above mentioned have been already paid by me. On 25.12.96 I paid 2000 shekels, which is more than the stated sum by 1000 shekels. On 16.1.97 I paid 1000 shekels, and on 25.2.97 I paid 2000 shekels. I did all of this to express my protest against injustice that came to me due to this “court”, when the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias lied, and the stupid judge and the prosecutor believed to their friend, and inferred from the fact, that the defendant, who was unable to protect himself and stand against lies, the plaintiff, a liar, being a professional lawyer, tells the truth. The “trial” was ruled without any touch of the equal rights principle. The defendant was not represented by an attorney; he was not given a possibility to have a look into the file of the criminal case and into the results of the medical expertises, and was forced to unsuccessfully stand against the plaintiff, who is a lawyer.

The trial in this exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations, was lasting for a lot of time (it is interesting to know – why and who was interested), and was held in quite a strange manner. The defendant notified several times, orally and in writing, that he has no possibility to stand against the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias, a liar. The defendant notified several times, orally and in writing, that he has not an identification card, and that the secretary refrains from giving him a possibility to study and to copy the criminal case file. The judge, a layman, ignored all of this. On 2.11.94, as I approached the secretary to append a document to the criminal case file, she had told me that the file is at the judge. However, she refused to tell me why. On 21.8.95 as a protest I returned the charge sheet and the letter, since they do not let me study the criminal case file, a lot of the returning and changing the course differences, and because the court refrains from inviting the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias, at the time of giving his testimony, presented a number of documents to the judge. The judge, a layman, asked me every time when he received a document as the plaintiff’s testimony, if I had an objection against passing the documents, but he did not show me them, and did not reveal their content to me. And this is the exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations.

As I got up to the podium to testify and to answer the claims that were raised against me, I was not able to open my mouth and to answer the claims for the reasons mentioned already and for a stammer, which strikes me. The manner, in which the “trial” was ruled, when a lawyer (the plaintiff) testifies the lies, and passes letters, while the defendant has no idea what are they, and the judge, a layman believes to his every word, leads me to the state of mental tense, helplessness, and stammer. The prosecutor and the “judge” concluded from silence of the defendant and lack of the possibility for him to defend himself, that the plaintiff tells the truth. After my failure to testify and to answer plaintiff’s claims I spoke to the judge as follows: “The lie, which is recalled many times turns to be the truth”. (Quotation is taken from the statement of our master, teacher and rabbi Yozef Gebbels, be blessed the memory of the righteous and the saint, accepted and honored in Israel). The judge, a layman agreed with me.

As if Gering and Nazi Justice Minister were visiting the State of Israel, whole and holy, as the guests of Fihrer Netaniyahu, Gush Emunim (Israeli religious party, which fights for the territories and setlements and inhabit Judea, Samariya and Gush Katif) and the holy saint doctor Baruh Goldshtein, be blessed the memory of the righteous and the saint, were praying and honoring at the tomb of righteous saint. Respected guests of Fihrer Netaniyahu were visiting settlements, Shabak’s (Israeli secret service agency) investigation facilities, military and civil courts of law, as guests of the Ministry of Justisce, which is lead by the hooligan Tsahi Hanegbi, and were very pleased by the picture of the Israeli “justice”. There presence at the “trial” against me would lead to the burst of pleasant memories, and nostalgia for the days of their delight in the Third Reich. The “trial” against me and against many others, Jews and Arabs, here, in the Third Universal Temple reminded them of their lost youth and an exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to Jewish people, according to the principles of liberty, justice, righteousness and peace of Jewish heritage, and values of Jewish tradition, which were the values of Dmitriy and his friends, and the severe punishment which was imposed on Wan der Loba, who, for the lack of any possibility to defend himself, was sentenced to death.

Our master, teacher and rabbi Yozef Gebbels, be blessed the memory of the righteous and the saint, accepted and honored in Israel, who would join the delegation, would be very surprised to find his innocent and holy teaching being applied fully by his numerous followers. His saying, – “Lie, which is recalled many times turns to be the truth”, was the slogan for Landoy committee, which stated, that it is permitted to take all kind of measures, if the issue is vital and for the good of Jews and the State of Israel. Also, Israeli courts of law make use of the holy teaching of our master, teacher and rabbi Yozef Gebbels, be blessed the memory of the righteous and the saint. The lies, coming from the Shabak (Israeli secret service agency) and police investigators, interesant testifiers, and soldiers, who stand at the front line of private and civil rights protection, turn out to be truth.

In the advertisements that I posted, I mentioned, that at the previous trials against me for the same accusations, attorneys who were appointed to me by the court of law, performed their jobs perfectly, and the defendant was vindicated! When I told my “attorney” about the two trials, in which I was vindicated, he lied and asserted that there is no any connection between the criminal cases, and he said to me even more lies, which lawyers like to tell their naive clients. “My entrusted attorney” saved himself a lot of time and work, and the court that appointed him as my “attorney” earned as well.

Twice I was sent for an observation. The “judge”, who red the first medical expertise report, asked me, what mental hospital I was hospitalized in. In the two medical expertise reports there are substantional gaps. I have written about that. Absolute ignorance. In the first medical expertise report it was asserted (regarding myself), “the defendant suffers from a great number of mental problems”. In the second medical expertise report it was asserted about me that I am fully recovered. This was medical and legal miracle.

On 10.4.95 I sent a letter to the court of law, which contained my request not to be present at the trial against me, and the reasons for that. The judge, a layman, stated in his well-grounded verdict, that he found me guilty, and he announced his attitude to the righteous and innocent plaintiff, and everything that is written in the letter, which is attached to this.

On 10.12.10, in the morning, after the “judge” entered the hall, the defendant, a dangerous and cruel hooligan, stupid Jew Shabtay Levi (I call myself all these names to express the protest, anger, offence and frustration for the fact that everybody consider me that way – courts of law, police, government offices and others, attitude of total ignorance, scorn and arrogance, as Nazis offended Jews, and as Nazi Jews offend Arabs and Jews) attacked cruelly and with a great anger the poor innocent plaintiff, attacked him with such a brutality and wildness, which one cannot express verbally. And if he was not protected by bodies of people in the hall, and by two security men, whom the poor plaintiff invited because of the suspicion of threat for his life, who worked hard to calm down the dangerous criminal, it’s a great doubt, if the poor plaintiff, the righteous and innocent one, who is not able to harm anybody, could present his testimony and bring the criminal to conviction.

It’s worth to mention here, that the clever judge of the Peace Court of Law in Tel-Aviv, criminal case number 2302/79, branded the cruel criminal, a hooligan, stupid Jew Shabtay Levi as “white collar man, who performed numerous brutal actions”. There is no such a crime, ugly or outrageous action, which the brutal criminal, a hooligan, white collar man abhorred doing. So, what are the numerous crimes committed by this stupid Jewish criminal Shabtay Levi and who are his numerous victims? In the criminal record of the police the brutal defendant, a hooligan, stupid Jew Shabtay Levi is accused for attacking a policeman!!! The poor policeman was hospitalized in bad condition and he is still in Bet Levinshtein.

(On 10.12.96, as the plaintiff appeared to testify for the first time, I asked him, laughing, if he comes to protect me. The poor plaintiff, victim of brutality and racism, walked out from the hall quickly and returned with two security men. And he pointed on me. The security men got close to me from the suspicion that I would hurt the poor plaintiff and beat him severely.)

The wording “the defendant, dangerous and cruel hooligan, attacked…” fits the truth of the plaintiff and the court of law. Lie, which returns many times, and which is for the good of the miserable plaintiff, a victim of cruelty and racism, and for the good of the court, the state of Israel, is turned to be truth, according to the saying by our master, teacher and rabbi Yozef Gebbels, be blessed the memory of the righteous and the saint, accepted and honored in Israel. The judge, a layman, Hanan Efrati believes to this false wording, which turned to the truth, since it’s good for the court of law, for the plaintiff and for the State of Israel.

The poor helpless plaintiff told the judge about complex of threats and tortures he suffered from the defendant. The poor plaintiff, a truth teller, declared himself a victim of cruelty and racism, since the advertisements, posted near the court, Tel-Aviv Agency of Lawyers, and surroundings, contained swastika. The plaintiff has at his disposal a lot of righteous and honest witnesses, who can testify, that they saw the advertisements with swastika.

The “court” was lasting for two years (from 7.6.94 to 10.12.97), after all kinds of differences, and judged changed. The plaintiff was invited to testify, but he did not appear. On 2.11.94 the file was at the judge. I do not know why. The defendant knows nothing about the content of the file since he is not given a possibility to study it. All the letters that the defendant sent to the court of law were not honored by any answer.

As they finished the “trial” and the “judge” got out of the hall, the defendant attacked the miserable victim once again, a righteous and naive one, the poor lawyer Maxim Atias, who just brought the former to the sentence, and threatened him at the presence of everybody in the hall, and the security man, he would send him to hospital in bad condition, as he had already done in the past to his numerous victims.

So, for all these reasons, I have decided that the offensive sum of 1000 shekels, a compensation to this miserable plaintive, which the court of Law of the State of Israel, a prostitute, stated (see my letter of 10.9.96), is not big enough for the poor plaintiff, a victim of the brutality and racism. And so I have decided to add and pay more. The following sums of money I will send directly to the poor plaintiff.

The stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi

(“Mursa” is an infectious purulent wound. “Moreshet Israel” is interpreted as a matter of religious, traditional, historical, cultural, ecumenical and other values, which is being inherited from farther to son. Today “Moreshet Israel” is a “Moreset Israel”, – from “mursa”, an abscess, – occupation, suppression, Racism, Apartheid. Filling an Arab village with sewage, blowing and attacking only civil targets, and war crimes). A Fihrer Menahem Begin decided that the courts of law in Israel would rely less upon the English Law, but more upon the Moreshet Israel (Jewish heritage) principles of liberty, justice, honesty and peace, and upon the values of the Jewish tradition. Just to mention – the Nuremberg Laws are based upon the Moreset (abscess) Israel.

(On 16.4.97, a month after I sent this letter, I paid another NIS 1000)

The Minister of Justice and the State Controller did not return the checks to me. The checks, which I sent, were of the court of law, the return of the payments that I paid voluntarily, in addition to what the court of law stated for me to pay. I do not know, what happened to those checks.

29.4.97

To the Minister of Justice of the State of Israel, a prostitute,

worthless Tsahi Hanegbi, State Controller.

Concerning the criminal case No. 7854/93

On 18.3.97 I have sent you a letter with a check attached to it. The letter was passed to the direction of the Court of Law. As I expected, it led to nothing. You kept the checks. Assistant of the Director of the Court did not find in my statements any reason for interference. That proves the truthfulness of my words, as they appeared in the letters I have written to you and others.

Stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi only earned (the Albek miracle) from the exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations, which was made against him, (which is very similar to the military trials which are carried on the occupied territories, where the judges always believe to Jews, as they are settlers, soldiers and policemen, Kvizalings and kapo (cooperators). From the compensation, that you have put upon him to pay, and from the payment obligation of 5000 shekels (that has already been fully paid), you can requisite the checks on 5000 shekels, which stay with you, and to add them to the good of the State of Israel, a prostitute, according to the law, as you do to Arabs.

The judge, a layman believed to every single word coming out of the plaintiff’s mouth, the lawyer Maxim Atias, his professional partner. The complainer added to his lies, taking advantage of the long period of time passed since he submitted his complaint to the police and until the day of his testimony: in his testimony he argued that on the advertisements, which I posted, there were swastikas. In his complaint, which he submitted to the police, he did not metion swastikas at all.

As the judge, a layman’s friend – the plaintiff, lawyer Maxim Atias, gave his testimony, he presented several documents. The “judge” asked me, concerning every document, which was presented to him, whether I object that the plaintiff will give them to the judge. I do not know anything about the content of the documents. As this stupid judge told me to step on the podium to testify and to answer, I could not say a word since I had not yet studied the file and the results of the medical expertise, and the documents presented by the plaintiff had not been shown to me. Indeed, the exemplary Law Court of Justice is light to the nations, it is righteous and it is the peace of the Moreset Israel, it represents Jewish Heritage values and Nuremberg Laws.

From this stupid judge’s verdict and from the glorious words of the flatterers and lickers, which he heaped on his friend, the plaintiff, it is clearly and unambiguously seen that the “judge” supports his friend, the plaintiff, and tends to his side.

The payment obligation of 5000 shekels I have already fulfilled by paying the money at the box-office of the court of law of the State of Israel, a prostitute. Just confiscate these money according to the law and give to your friend as a compensation, as well.

Shabbtay doesn’t forget, doesn’t forgive and doesn’t give up.

Shabbtay Levi.

15.7.97

To the Minister of Justice of the State of Israel, a prostitute,

worthless Tsahi Hanegbi;

To the Minister of Finance of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

To the Minister of Interior of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

To the Minister of Religions of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

To the State Controller of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

To the Minister of Education of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

To the Prime Minister of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

To the President of the State of Israel, a prostitute;

Concerning the criminal case No. 7854/93

Harlot’s Pay.

On 27.8.97 I handled the check of the courts of law system to the policeman at the entrance of the Ministry of Justice that I paid over the sum which was stated by the court of law as a protest, and which was returned to me. In the answer by Eyal Gabbay, an adviser of the Minister of Justice, there was the unambiguous statement that the State of Israel, a prostitute, is ready to willingly accept this harlot’s pay, but only not to transfer this check through the office of the worthless Minister (his letter of 29.8.97).

Money does not smell. The answer by the lawyer Eyal Gabbay, an advisor of the worthless Minister of Justice, approves that the State of Israel, a prostitute, is ready to receive willingly from me the proper harlot’s pay, which will be transferred for the good of the whole Erets Israel, to the Jewish religious institutions and Shas (the ultra religious party of “Sefardic” Jews).

You are ready to take insults and abuse forever, as a garbage pit or sewerage system, but only not to check up my statements about the exemplary court of law, light to the nations, criminal case number 7854/93, that the plaintiff, a lawyer Maxim Atias lied, and the judge, a layman, believed to its every word.

Be you having just a bit of respect, righteousness and fairness, you would have already checked this matter. But you, being mean and contemptible, filth of the humankind, heirs to the Nazis and their successors, behave like wretched rags and you can silently accept every insult in order to support the judge, a layman, and his friend, a lier, the lawyer Maxim Atias, who also got 1000 shekels in cash, which I sent him on 15.4.97, in addition to the decision made by his friend, the judge, a layman.

Divide the proper harlot’s pay of 5000 shekels, which I have paid to you, between yourself for the good of the Whole State of Israel, religious institutions, people of your peace and proper pigs, which are close to the establishment. In addition, as a protest I paid also for the criminal case number 1858/89, Peace Court of law in Tel-Aviv, for the criminal case number 2436/90, Peace Court of Law in Nazareth and for the criminal case number 1/91, Nazareth. There are no many that stupid Jews like me, who pay much more than they were sentenced to pay by a court of law. The State of Israel, a prostitute, rushes to use that for its own good, for the glory and pride of the State of Israel, a prostitute.

The stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi.

To the Peace Court of Law in Tel-Aviv

Criminal case number 3995/98

Filed at the secretariat of the court of law on 9.4.98

Letter of Defense

My letter of defense for the criminal case number 3995/98 is presented hereafter.

The defendant is aware of every parts and paragraphs of the accusation, and more than that. (See “notification of guilt”, attached to this).

The defendant will refrain from appointing an attorney to him, and he will absolutely reject to accept any attorney from the court of law, as it happened during the previous trial, criminal case number 7854/93. The defendant, stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi, will do all that voluntarily in order not to harm the exemplary Law Court of Justice, light to the nations, and to save an expensive time of the Court of Law and of the plaintiff, and to donate a great donation for the truth, democracy, and the plaintiff’s right to receive more compensations according to the principles of liberty, justice, righteousness and peace of the Jewish heritage, and the values of the Jewish tradition, and for the pride and glory of the State of Israel.

There exist a great suspicion and a very dangerous threat, that if there is an attorney to the defendant, God forbid, (not of the kind as the plaintiff, who was appointed to me by the court of law), the poor plaintiff will not succeed to make an impression upon the judge about his bright and truthful statements, and to bring him to believing to his every word. If this awful disaster happens, the poor and innocent plaintiff will loose the compensation money, which the court of law will state for him to get from me, and maybe some doubts about the previous trial will appear (criminal case number 7854/93). If my attorney succeed to appeal about the righteous plaintiff’s testimony, who never lied, a great legal injustice can happen to the poor plaintiff, as well as a serious legal mistake, and a great damage to his legal rights and his good name, to the democracy and the principles of the law and truth, and the loss of the compensation money. Since that it is strictly forbidden for the defendant to be presented by an attorney, who will defend him, be it of his choice or be it of the choice of the court of law.

I do this voluntarily for the good of the plaintiff, in order not to harm and not to make damage to his democratic rights, and to the court of law, and to save the expensive money for the Court of Law, and the plaintiff, and that the Court of Law will state the compensation to the soldier, who stands at the first line of defense of private and civil rights, instantly, without delay. The Court of Law is to accuse the defendant on every paragraph of the accusation and sentence him severely, and to state a nice sum of compensation to the miserable plaintiff.

Fines and compensation, which the judge stated and will state on the defendant, bring a great educational, general and traditional message to the defendant, and the feelings of justice and security from the defendant’s threats to and bothering the plaintiff. Cultural and traditional fines and compensations, which the defendant Shabbtay Levi, this stupid Jew, paid and will pay, are to protect the democratic rights of the plaintiff, to prevent serious and heavy illegal damage to the body, soul and freedom of the helpless miserable plaintiff, and the improvement of the financial condition of the plaintiff and the State of Israel, to the pride and glory of the State of Israel.

On 8.4.98 the defendant Shabbtay Levi, a stupid Jew paid 1000 shekels, in advance to an account of the compensations to the miserable plaintiff. The rest of the money, which I owe to the plaintiff according to the verdict, I will pay after the trial is finished. There are no many stupid Jews like me in the State of Israel. The plaintiff and the court of law are to use this fact for their own good and to squeeze from the defendant, a stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi as much money as possible for the good of the Whole State of Israel. There is no any difference between the stupid Jew and Arabs. Thus the State of Israel, the court of law and the plaintiff are to state heavy fines and compensations for the criminal, a stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi to pay for the pride and glory of the State of Israel.

Shabbtay Levi

The Tel-Aviv Peace Court of Law

Criminal case number 3995/98

Filed in the secretariat of the court of law on 9.4.98

Notification of guilt

First accusation: the defendant after he told the plaintiff: “Piece of a coward, piece of a garbage”, and other insults and threats, and all that was done in a threatening and terrifying manner, invoking fear, illegally, against the law and cultural standards, jumped towards his victim, the miserable lawyer Maxim Atias, who is unable to harm a fly or hurt a man, and tried to strangle him and cause many physical damages and by this to prevent him from testifying. The innocent miserable plaintiff succeeded, working hardly, to free himself from the strangle of the defendant, the criminal Shabbtay Levi, to get outside the court hall and to call for two security men, who will protect him. If not that, there is a great doubt whether the miserable plaintiff could testify and bring the defendant to the sentence.

In the criminal case number 2302/79 clever judge branded stupid Jewish criminal Shabbtay Levi as follows: “white color man, who performed numerous brutal actions”.

The second accusation: admit all the accusations. In the criminal record of the police there is an accusation of the criminal – stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi – for attacking a policeman!!!

The third accusation: I admit by this that I threatened the victim of the cruelty and racism, a miserable one, that I would break his skull, as Nazis did to Jews, that I wished him and his family disasters and explosions and that I drew swastikas. I attached 1000 shekels in cash as well. Due to his absolute righteousness and his great modesty the plaintiff did not report to the police in his complaint against me about this amount of money. The reason for that was that the plaintiff was ashamed to report to the police about the money, and that this sum (of 1000 shekels in addition to the amount which was stated by the Court of Law) belongs to him according to the law, as the Court of Law stated. The sum of 1000 shekels is by no means enough for the miserable victim of the brutality and racism. Thus I compensated my miserable and naive victim by additional 1000 shekels.

As soon as to the defendant, stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi, does not have any traditional possibility to stand against the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias, famous as a righteous of generation and a truth teller, who never lied, and as soon as the plaintiff has at his disposal a wide range of quite solid proofs and proper and righteous witnesses, and a lot of evidence, and in order to prevent the rude and heavy damage to the democratic rights of the righteous plaintiff, and to the possibility for him to get compensations for another time, the defendant, this stupid Jew, decided to confess to all the accusations against him voluntarily, and all that not as the last time, when he did not confess to the accusations, and caused the Court of Law to last for two and a half years, and the trial prolongation, which was very painful for the miserable plaintiff, occurred, and he had to wait extra time for the compensation money. Since it is accepted, that the plaintiff, a naive and righteous one, who never lied, a truth teller, and the defendant confess to the crime voluntarily, there is no need to invite the plaintiff to testify, and by this to prevent the defendant, a stupid Jew, from attacking him for another time and to threaten his life, as it happened the previous time. (The miserable plaintiff still suffers from fears and horrors due to traumatic experience.)

The defendant – stupid Jew Shabbtay Levi – is very similar to an Arab, so one should relate to him accordingly.

The plaintiff needs money badly as well as the State of Israel. Thus it is necessary to convict the criminal, and to state heavy fines and compensations according to law for him to pay, as they do to Arabs.

Shabbtay Levi

On 22.2.98 I sent every worthless actors in the play a letter, in which I recalled the ugly words of praise, which the judge, a layman, heaped upon the plaintiff, his friend, the lawyer Maxim Atias, a miserable victim of the cruelty and racism. The quotations were written in handwriting, in large rude round letters, colored brown, dark yellow and black, which are similar to the colors of excrement. The letters were written bent, as excrement go out. To my best knowledge, that is the way to express my deep disgust for the relationship between the judge and the plaintiff.

3.5.1998

To all the addressees who received the letter of 22.2.98: the President of the Supreme Court, No. 9197/51 of 23.2.98, Chief Judge of Tel-Aviv Court of Peace, (not answered), chairman of the Parliament, (not answered), State Comptroller (not answered), Justice Minister 3654/98 of 10.3.98, Prime Minister, the President (not answered)

The copies of the letters of 18.3.97 and of 10.4.95 are attached to this letter.

Concerning the criminal case No. 7854/93

This letter constitutes a crime of ignorance of court of law and of insulting a senior public man.

In the State of Israel it is allowed to the state, to the judges and to senior public men to harm, to humiliate, to lie, to deprive and to discriminate an individual, and the things are known. There are no laws to protect an individual, similar to those laws of attacking a policeman, of insulting public men and of ignorance of court of law. I am definitely positive, that I am very likely to be punished heavily due to this letter. Suffering, misfortune and pain, which were done to me (by the “trial”, by the road accident of 24.4.70, when I was hurt, criminal case No. 2241/70, which was closed for “lack of proofs”, and the driver who knocked me down, made me disabled man and ruined my life, was not judged and is was not punished, by the payment delay criminal cases that lost from “lack of proofs”, by the abuses and the humiliations that suffered from when I was young, and more), is not considered as a reason to ease my lot, because of the fact that the State of Israel does not consider hardship as being any justifying reason. The following is written in your Holy Torah: “One is not allowed to take advantage of a man when he is in hardship”. On the condition, of course, that the man is of pure Jewish race, chosen of the nations, that his skull is of the right structure, and that he belongs to the Jewish nation of masters, (and to its right congregation!). That has never been applied to Arabs and to such a stupid Jewish guy as I am, inferior human being, worthless man, who is not considered as a personality that should be taken into account and that should be respected, who is very similar to an Arab.

Most of the addressees who received the letters of 22.2.98 did not understand, or did not want to understand the meaning of the big and obscene characters of brown yellow and black colors, which were crooked and skewed. The colors symbolize excrements, and the crookedness of the words comes from the fact that it is impossible to line up the characters into the straight line. The verdict by the judge Hanan Efrati, a layman, criminal case No. 93/7854, which was announced on 10.12.97, deserves to be written in the characters, which are similar to droppings, and that was the reason why I had chosen to cite an abstract of the verdict in such kind of characters, to express my deep aversion to the verdict, and the ugly compliments and the lies that were abundantly spilled upon the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias who lied, and the judge, a layman believed to his every word. (See letters of 18.3.97). (The miserable addressees, who received this letter, of 18.3.97, with the attached court checks to it, did not return those checks yet, for the fact that the State of Israel, being a prostitute, needs money badly, (as it is well known, money does not smell).

I do not require a retrial, and there is no point to in an additional trial in this criminal case, if judges and laws are that like that. Everything that is against me (evidence, testimonies, etc…”), it is the truth, and vise versa. And anything that is in favor of the State of Israel and the Jews, the Police, the Shabak, the court and the plaintiff, a soldier whose position is in the first line of the protection of the rights of individuals and citizens, friend of the judge, is the truth, and vise versa. (Landoi Committee statement). Therefore, it is forbidden to believe the defendant, the stupid Jew Shabtai Levy, a hooligan and a violent person, “white collar man, who committed a lot of violent acts”, (the statement by the clever judge from the criminal case No. /230279 of the peace Court of Law in Tel Aviv). The justice of the exemplary Court of Law, Light to the Nations, has already been done, and the defendant, the stupid Jew Shabtai Levy paid the compensations to the miserable plaintiff twice, and also the obligation, not to frighten the miserable plaintiff.

If a retrial would take place, God forbid that, there exists a serious suspicion, that a lawyer who would be appointed to me, (if any, and under the condition that he would perform his duties properly), he would succeed to disprove the lies of the plaintiff, he would expose procedural defects that were in the trial, and he would ask the plaintiff depressing questions, and the miserable plaintiff, the friend of the judge would be compelled to return the compensations that he got, so to say. Therefore, in an attempt to prevent the miserable plaintiff, victim of violence and racism from judicial distortions like those, and trial delay, and to sabotage the exemplary Court of Law, Light to the Nations, it is forbidden to perform a retrial.

The defendant does not any retrial as well, which would be the Exemplary Court of Law, Light to the Nations, exactly like in the previous trial, (and in other ones), and it was positively proven, that the defendant lies, and the righteous and miserable plaintiff, who never said a lie, a truth teller.

The judge, a layman ceremonially promised me on 14.4.96 that he would protect my rights. And indeed, nice looking intentions lead to nice looking deeds. The judge, who protected my rights thoroughly, and with great loyalty, took the check of the court away from the plaintiff, a criminal. That check was returned to me (criminal case No. 1854/89, that the plaintiff “protected me”), and all this was done in an attempt to prevent the possibility for the plaintiff, a crook, to use that check, which was for the defendant, against me. The check, together with my properly protected rights, was thoroughly kept by the judge in the proper and protected shelter – in the criminal file 7854/93.

The State of Israel, being a prostitute, annexed to itself, for love of Israel, the money, which I paid for the criminal case No. 1858/89 at the Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law, (for the “defense” by the plaintiff) and for the criminal case No. 2435/90 at the Nazareth Peace Court of Law and for the criminal case No. 1/91 at the Nazareth Regional Court of Law (That money was paid in the amount more than the court stated, as a protest). The courts of law of the State of Israel, a prostitute, in Tel Aviv and Nazareth, returned me part of the money that was paid, and therefore I rejected to accept it. That money was expropriated to the favor of the prostitute state, including the sum of NIS 50 in cash that was sent to the secretariat of the court in Tel Aviv on 18.8.93 and to Nazareth. After I paid the original fine, that the court decreed, the sum of NIS 50, in Nazareth on 25.2.91, I added another NIS 50 on 24.7, on 30.7, and on 23.8.91, a policeman appeared in my house and claimed that I had not paid the fine. I paid another NIS 100 on 4.2.92, order No. 2270. (My total payments to the every court of law in Tel Aviv and Nazareth reached as much as NIS 700 – 800)

In addition to that, you will be able to add to yourselves (like that is done to Arabs), also the amount of NIS 300, that I paid on 22.2.94, receipt No. 4427 of the State of Israel, a prostitute, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law, as a warranty, to the criminal case PA 5 Yarkon 02979-94, that the plaintiff started. The criminal case is was closed on 1.3.94. The money has not returned to me yet, and it will have never be returned to me, due to the fact that the State of Israel, a prostitute, mother of all the prostitutes, expropriated this amount to her favor, like it was always done to Arabs, for the sake of the Unity of the State of Israel, of the creation of additional atomic bombs, and of the religious Jewish institutions, to the respect and to the beauty of the State of Israel.

The fact that the criminal case No. 2241/70 for “lack of proofs” was closed was also to the profit of the defendant, the stupid Jewish Shabtai Levy, from the exemplary court of law like that, as well as to his profit were prevention of medical treatments, loss of the criminal cases of payment delay for “lack of proofs”, discrimination by the National Insurance Agency (allowance delays), the compensations he was bound to pay to the plaintiff, and the warranty of the sum of NIS 5000, that had been already paid, and that according to the statement of the judicial prostitute Pliya Albek, who fit Arabs and stupid Jews as I am (and others).

Also the State of Israel, a prostitute, saved and earned 3 times: first – when I refused to accept a lawyer, who was appointed to me by the court of law, second – after I learnt the quality of the lawyer, who was appointed to me by the court of law (criminal case No. 1858/89, when the plaintiff “defended me”), third – when I paid the compensations twice, and payment of the warranty in the sum of NIS 5000)

The justice minister, a worthless one, the state comtroler, prime minister, The President of the State, The Chairman of the Parliament, the ministers of education, treasure, religions, interior, and others, who have received the letters from me (of 15.9.97 and other letters, concerning this file and the harlot’s pay that I have paid), act like miserable and inferior rags, and they are ready to absorb silently endless invectives and insults, like pit of garbage or pit of sewer, and all this is in order to cover on those kind of Exemplary Court of Law, and to keep the money for themselves.

“The thoughts of the righteous are right,

But the counsels of the wicked are courts of law.”

Shabtai Levy

(“The thoughts of the righteous are right, but the counsels of the wicked are deceitful”, Proverbs 12:5. The original saying from Proverbs was changed in order to adapt it to the Israeli reality.)

To the tel Aviv peace court of Law, criminal case No. 3995/98

To the president of the Supreme Court of Law in the Holy City of United Jerusalem, which was united together with it, be it built, repaired quickly and now – Amen.

To the Justice Minister in the Holy City of United Jerusalem, which was united together with it, be it built, repaired quickly and now – Amen.

To the state Controller in the Holy City of United Jerusalem, which was united together with it, be it built, repaired quickly and now – Amen.

To the Judicial Adviser for the government.

On 8.4.98, I paid the amount of NIS 1000, (harlot’s pay to the court), voluntarily, as an advance to the account of the compensations that the court of law would state, in the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations, according to the principals of freedom, justice, the integrity and the straightness of abscess (in Hebrew the word “abscess” is very similar to the word “tradition”) of Israel, and the values of Jewish ethics, for the miserable plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism, the soldier that stood at the first line of defense of human rights, miserable lawyer Maxim Atias, a victim of violence and racism.

On 28.7.98 I voluntarily paid (for the second time) the amount of NIS 1000 as an advance to the account of the compensations, which the court of law would decree to the miserable plaintiff. The court does not object to accept this sum of money, and any additional sum that would be paid, that would be delivered to the miserable plaintiff according to law, according to the adjudication of the court of law, at the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations. (I paid total NIS 2000 of the harlot’s pay to the court of law, the criminal case No. 98/3995, to respect and beauty of the State of Israel, a prostitute).

On 15.4.97 I voluntarily sent to the miserable plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism, the sum of NIS 1000, voluntarily, in a letter to his office. (The third accusation in the bill of indictment). The miserable plaintiff received with pleasure this amount of money that was paid according to law, in the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations, and did not report that to the Police in his complaint about my threats which he filed against me, for the miserable plaintiff badly needs the money, that balanced his poor budget, and was very useful to his bank account, and to the state.

Due to the fact that the State of Israel is a state of law and order, I hereby send to the miserable plaintiff, victim of violence and racism, what he deserves, as the court decreed, in the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations, by the court of law, in the respectful legal and kosher manner, which did not stink at all, for the fact that money does not smell. I hereby do this voluntarily, in an attempt to protect the democratic rights of the miserable plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism, and for the sake of his bank account, to respect and to beauty of the Sate of Israel, the only democracy in Middle East, peace and justice.

I paid so far the amount of NIS 9000, as the harlot’s pay to the court of law (NIS 5000 to the criminal criminal case 93/7854, to the miserable plaintiff NIS 1000, and another NIS 1000 voluntarily, and NIS 2000 to the criminal criminal case 98/3995), according to law, to the court of law, and to the miserable plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism, and it is not known since then. The state of Israel, and the miserable plaintiff, need the money badly, to create Jewish living space (Lebensraum), for the Jewish nation of masters, as it is written in your Holy Torah: “money brings money”.

The miserable and innocent plaintiff, suffered great deal from the violent criminal and hooligan, the stupid Jew Shabtai Levy, who abused badly, threatened him and his wife and mother, molested him and annoyed him without giving him a break, made his life miserable and caused a lot of pain, suffering and grief to him. (drawing swastikas).

There are no many stupid Jews like me, who pay voluntarily twice of compensations, obligations and fines. The miserable plaintiff, a victim of violence and racism, and the court are to exploit this fact, and to receive from the defendant more and more money, to the respect and to the beauty of the State of Israel.

The Fuhrer Yitzhak Shamir decreed that it was allowable to lie for the sake of the United Land of Israel. “The lie, which is recalled many times turns to be the truth” – that is the statement by our master, teacher and rabbi Josef Gebbels, be blessed the memory of the righteous and the saint, accepted and honored in Israel, and by the Landoi Committee. For the sake of the United Land of Israel it is allowable, and it is a duty to mobilize money from any possible source, be it Arabs or stupid Jews like me. The goal sanctifies all the means. Money that was taken and will be expropriated from non Jews, and will be given to a Jew, will not be ever returned.

Shabtai Levy

I did not receive answers to these letters. The miserable spineless creatures swallowed the insults quietly and did not react.

The appeal in the Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law, 25.11.98.

To the Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law, Criminal case No. 98/4388.

Criminal appeal on criminal criminal case No. 98/3995, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law.

By this I delivers the main points of my statements in writing, because of the fact that I do not have any possibility to deliver them orally, as a result of mental condition that prevents me from talking and from expressing myself properly. Also in the two of the previous criminal cases, 93/7854 and 98/3995, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law, due to the fact that I wasn’t able to talk, and to contradict the lies of the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias, I was convicted and sent to jail.

I serve the penalty of imprisonment, and sit in the jail. I don’t have a lawyer and I do not have any document at my disposal, I do not have any bill of indictment, and no verdict. In the letters that I have delivered to the secretariat of the court of law, concerning in the criminal cases No. 93/7854 ,98/3995 I have described me condition and lack of the ability to defend myself. (“Request for being sued not in my presence” of 10.4.95)

I hereby proclaim, that I known very well, that the things that I will deliver further, are very hard and acrid, that they are painful, and that they are not sufferable. Also the penalty and serving in jail are hard and painful, and, in particular, if one takes into account the fact that the plaintiff lied.

The State of Israel has accepted the statement “The lie, which is recalled many times turns to be the truth” by Dr. Josef Gebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister. The State of Israel improved and sharpened his statement in the way that it was enough to lie just one time, to make the truth from the lie.

The judge from the Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law, Hanan Efrati, who judged me in the two of the mentioned criminal cases, adopted the method. The lie that is in favor of the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias, in favor of the state, and against the defendant – is overturned to the truth.

My legal condition is very similar to the condition of Van der Loba, the Dutch who was sentenced to death “his part in “Reichstag fire”. As a result of his mental condition, he was not able to defend himself, exactly as it happened to me.

Two documents that I delivered to the court of law on9.4.98 , “notification of guilt” and “letter of defense”, which I have signed according to the request of the judge Nathan Efrati, and in his attendance, testify that.

The two documents, which were mentioned above, represent a result of the craft of lie and mendacity, and they are compatible to the testimony that the plaintiff, the lawyer Maxim Atias has delivered, and that was what has changed to be the truth. In these two documents, I have lied in favor of the plaintiff and against myself. The judge, Hanan Efrati believed to the every word that I had written, for the fact that it was in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

If that is what they mean by justice in the State of Israel, then I better continue serving in jail.

I am not interested to request mercy, and alleviation of the penalty.

Shabtai Levy

Carmel jail

(The final sentence, that reads: “I am not interested to request mercy, and alleviation of the penalty”, is false, unnecessary and misleading, and can possibly cause the innocent reader to think, that there is whatever chance that the courts of law in Israel will show mercy and alleviate the penalty). The appeal was postponed.

Summing up the “appeal”. 10.5.99

In October, 1998, I filed the appeal on the criminal case No. 98/3995 of the Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law, during the time when I served my sentence in jail. The “appeal” took place on 25.11.98 (I don’t have the verdict of the criminal case No. 3996/98, as well as the verdict of the criminal case No. 98/4388 from the Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law, and I do not need this. I have plenty of garbage at home).

The “appeal” in the Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law is very similar to the “trial” in the Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law. Also during the “appeal” in the Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law I was not able to talk all the time. My friend, who was with me at the “trial”, asked for permission to speak (as a result of the silence of the defendant), and he received it. His words did not impress the judges. The “appeal” was postponed.

About 10 years ago, approximately, a German court of law in Berlin exonerated Van der Loba. By that action the great injustice that was made to him was corrected.

In the State of Israel, there is no chance that a thing like that will ever happen. Not in my criminal case, nor in other criminal cases, Jews and Arabs, who were tortured to death during investigations by the Police and Shabak (Israeli secret service agency), and those who were broken in torments, and confessed, and the courts of law issued their verdicts on the basis of their confessions in torments. (according to the recommendation of the Landoi Committee).

In the appeal that I filed to the Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law, criminal case No. 4388/98, that was appointed on 25.11.98, before the judges Berliner, Homer and Bizer, unequivocal proof was given to that fact. The Tel Aviv Regional Court of Law, led by the judge Berliner, rejected my request.

Van der Loba was exonerates after his death. Me, and many others, Jews and Arabs, will not be given that honor till the end of the world.

In Berlin injustice was corrected. At the regional judge Berliner in Tel Aviv – not.

Shabtai Levy

Resume of all the sums of money that was paid to the court of law, as harlot’s pay to the court of law.

25.12.96 – NIS 2000 for the criminal criminal case No. 7854/93, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law.

16.1.97 – NIS 1000 for the criminal criminal case No. 7854/93, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law.

25.2.97 – NIS 2000 for the criminal criminal case No. 7854/93, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law.

16.4.97 – NIS 1000 for the criminal criminal case No. 7854/93, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law.

15.4.97 – NIS 1000 to the miserable lawyer Maxim Atias, a victim of violence and racism.

8.4.98 – NIS 1000 for the criminal criminal case No. 3995/98, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law (advance).

28.7.98 – NIS 1000 for the criminal criminal case No. 3995/98, Tel Aviv Peace Court of Law (advance).

(The lawyer Plia Albek, serving as the director of the civil department of the state advocacy (in the past), performed a “study” in an attempt to prove that the settlements were not situated on the expropriated Palestinian land. She helped herself with an airplane, which flew above the occupied territories. The lawyer deduced that the settlements were not placed on the land that was expropriated, correct and precise like the “lie of Auschwitz”, that was employed by Holocaust deniers.)

(Neo Nazis deny the Holocaust of the European Jewry, the same way as Zionists deny “Al Nakba” – the Palestinian Holocaust, and the Holocaust that stroke other nations – Indians, Armenians, Gypsies, Kurds and more).

(The judicial prostitute, lawyer Plia Albek, the former manager of the civilian department in the advocacy of the state, took care of the Palestinian plaintiff, who argued that his wife was assassinated by the security forces. In an attempt to prevent him from receiving indemnity, she stated that the Palestinian “only earned from death of his wife”. Additional suit action, by a falafel seller, whose two hands were cut off at the time when he was climbing the electric pole, in an attempt to get a Palestinian flag down, under compulsion, when the security forces made him to do so by threats, was rejected for the argument that ablation of his two hands will not disturb him in his work of production and sale of falafel.) The same way the stupid Jew Shabtai Levy only earned from the accident, the closure of the criminal case, prevention of medical treatments, from the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations, and from serving sentence in jail.

When the law lies and the justice is futile – a prostitute will will be praised.

(“Charm is deceitful and beauty is passing, But a woman who fears the LORD, she shall be praised”, Proverbs 31:30. The original saying from Proverbs was changed in order to adapt it to the Israeli reality.)

On 16.9.99 the Jerusalem Regional Court of Law acquitted the murderer Nahum Korman from the settlement “Hadar Beitar”. The judge ignored the evidence of the inhabitants of the village “Hussan” and from the report of the pathological institute., and she took into account only to the evidence of Jews, the friends of the murderer. The murderer Nahum Korman shot from the very close distance Said Hilmi Sausa, an eleven years old boy, right to his head, he put his gun right onto the head of the victim, and fired the bullets right into the head of the victim from this short distance. It was exactly that way, exactly as Nazis used to act.

In the book “Shimshon” by Zeev Jabotinski, (a fascist, the “spiritual” father the revisionists in Israel. The rabbi and the teacher of Begin, Shamir, Sharon, Netanyahu, and the elite of the Likud party), (and of the Jewish judge Hanan Efrati), there is an example to the Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations: “two brothers came to be judged in front of a Hebrew judge concerning the issue, how to divide the harvest from the mutual field. The elder brother claimed, that all the crop was his, but the younger brother claimed, that one half of the crop was his, and another half – of his brother. The Jewish judge decreed, according to the ideals of freedom, justice, righteousness and peace of the abscess of Israel (in Hebrew the word “abscess” is very similar to the word “tradition”), and the Jewish ethical values of the Hebrew court of law, that way: “there is no argument about one half of the harvest – both of you agree that it belongs to the elder brother. Only the other half is the issue of this trial. Therefore, three quarters of the harvest will be given to the elder brother, and one quarter – to the younger one”.

The Jewish judge, being more merciful than merciful, gave an explanation for his decision: “the eldest brother is a liar, but the younger one is a stupid one, and stupidity is much worth than mendacity”. So – Exemplary Law Court of Justice, Light to the Nations.

Jabotinski, a vigorous fascist, chose Shimshon to be the “judge” due to the fact that the latter was notable in the battlefield for fighting and killing a lot of Palestinians. Bravery, shown by Shimshon, being a fighter, qualified him, in the eyes of Jabotinski, for performing duties of judge.

The vision of the last days of the World from Isaiah the prophet:

But with righteousness He shall judge the poor,

And decide with equity for the meek of the earth;

He shall strike the earth with the rod of His mouth,

And with the breath of His lips He shall slay the wicked.

Righteousness shall be the belt of His loins,

And faithfulness the belt of His waist

(Isaiah 11:4 – 5), did not fit to the image of the Hebrew judge, which Jabotinski employed.

The visions by the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah and others, concerning righteous law and proper relations between people, without exploitation, robbery and fraud have not been realized yet, and will not be realized till the end of the World. Vision by the fascist Jabotinski (and of the fuhrer David Ben Gurion and others), have already been fully implemented and established in the State of Israel, to respect and to beauty of the State of Israel. The judge Hanan Efrati is a good example to that, and there are plenty like him in Israel and in the entire world.

The fascist Jabotinski said: “In the beginning God created my justice”. “My justice” is a kind of justice of the nation of Jewish masters, who have the right structure of skull, pure racial Jews, chosen of the nations and the nation of Salvation, and of the State of Israel only. It is the justice of the barons that rob, of the strong, of the rich, the petty thieves, the power possessors, the governors. For the sake of this justice it is allowable to Jews and to strong to lie, to assassinate, to rob the Arabs and the week, and to execute every other crime, as long as it is essential and advantageous to Jews and to the State of Israel. (The Landoi Commettee statement).

And indeed, the pupil of Jabotinski, the former fuhrer Yitzhak Shamir, said that it was allowable to lie for the sake of the Land of United Israel. The member of the parliament Limor Livnat, (the one, who was called by her fellows from Likud party as “white terrorist”, said in the interview on radio, that in order to be a Zionist, one is not allowed to be objective. Landoi Committee, which discussions proceeded under the torments of Shabak and Police, stated that for the sake of security of the state, it was allowable to adopt all the means, including torments (ticking bomb). (The criminal case of the line 300).

At the “trial”, which took place in Tel Aviv, concerning the group rape of an 11 years old child, the “judge”, Ahitov Validski: “The child seems to enjoy the action, and does not look as one who was forced to do anything”. (“Yediot Ahronot”, 26.10.07, Mordihai Gilat)

Shabtai Does Not Forget, Does Not Excuse And Does Not Give Up!!!

No responses yet

Comments are closed.